Venue: Civic Hall, Leeds
Contact: Helen Gray 247 4355
No. | Item |
---|---|
Election of Chair Minutes: RESOLVED – That Councillor G Hussain be elected as Chair for the duration of the meeting.
The following were present at the hearing:
For Red Leopard:
Miss Roth, Kher Solicitors Mr D Marriner, Manager Ms S Levine, Designated Premises Supervisor Mr G Snape, Consultant
Observers: Mr Whur Mr Gourlay Mr Makrinakis Mr Chang Mr Lee Mr Keane Mr Hartley
|
|
Appeals Against Refusal of Inspection of Documents To consider any appeals in accordance with Procedure Rule 15.2 of the Access to Information Procedure Rules (in the event of an Appeal the press and public will be excluded)
(*In accordance with Procedure Rule 15.2, written notice of an appeal must be received by the Head of Governance Services at least 24 hours before the meeting)
Minutes: There were no appeals against refusal of inspection of documents.
|
|
Exempt Information - Possible Exclusion of the Press and Public 1) To highlight reports or appendices which:
a) officers have identified as containing exempt information, and where officers consider that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, for the reasons outlined in the report.
b) To consider whether or not to accept the officers recommendation in respect of the above information.
c) If so, to formally pass the following resolution:-
RESOLVED – That the press and public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of those parts of the agenda designated as containing exempt information on the grounds that it is likely, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted or the nature of the proceedings, that if members of the press and public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information
2) To note that under the Licensing Procedure Rules, the press and the public will be excluded from that part of the hearing where Members will deliberate on each application as it is in the public interest to allow the Members to have a full and frank debate on the matter before them.
Minutes: The Sub Committee felt that the hearing should be held in the public domain and agreed that wherever possible, specific reference to the contents of the exempt information contained within Appendix B of the report should not be referred to, however if it became necessary, the public and press would be excluded from the meeting as follows:
RESOLVED – That the public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of that part of the agenda designated as exempt information on the grounds that it is likely, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted or the nature of the proceedings, that if members of the public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information as contained in Appendix B of the report referred to in Minute No. 27 in terms of the Licensing Procedure Rules, and on the grounds that it is not in the public interest to disclose the contents as the information therein pertains to an individual and that person would not reasonably expect their personal information or discussions thereon to be in the public domain.
|
|
Late Items Minutes: No formal late items of business were added to the agenda for the meeting. It was noted that Appendix H of the report of the Head of Licensing and Registration referred to the standard conditions of the previous Sex Establishment policy and for the avoidance of doubt, a replacement Appendix H which related to the Licensing of Sex Establishments Statement of Licensing Policy (“the Policy”) which came into effect on 1 September 2013 was circulated at the meeting
|
|
Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests Members are reminded to disclose or draw attention to any disclosable pecuniary interests at the start of the hearing on each application for the purposes of Section 31 of the Localism Act 2011 and paragraphs 13-16 of the Members Code of Conduct Minutes: There were no declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests.
|
|
To consider a report of the Head of Licensing and Registration on an application made under Section 2 and Schedule 3 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982 for the renewal of a Sex Establishment Licence for the premises known as Red Leopard, Jubilee Hotel, 163-167 The Headrow LS1
Please note that Appendix B of the report is regarded as exempt from publication under the provisions of Access to Information Procedure Rule 10.4 (1,2 and 3)
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Licensing Sub-Committee considered a report of the Head of Licensing and Registration on an application made under Section 2 and Schedule 3 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982, as amended, for the renewal of a sex establishment licence. The application was made by Fellmore Limited, Jubilee Chambers, 163-167 The Headrow, Leeds, LS1 2QS relating to the premises known as ‘The Red Leopard, 163-167 The Headrow, Leeds. The basement level, ground floor and first floor were to be covered under the provisions of the licence, with proposed hours of operation of 22:00 hours until 04:00 hours Sunday to Thursday and 22:00 hours until 05:00 hours Friday and Saturday.
The report on the application included the following documentation which Members considered during their deliberations: · Dancers Welfare Policy · Dancers Code of Conduct · Customers Code of Conduct · Fines Policy · Pricing Policy · Trade Union details · Appearance/advertising material · Site plan
Colour copies of the appearance/advertising material and a further location plan showing the premises in relation to other sensitive uses as set out in the Council’s Licensing of Sex Establishments – Statement of Licensing Policy were also provided.
Appendix B of the report was exempt from publication under Access to Information Procedure Rule 10.4 (1, 2 and 3) however the Sub Committee resolved not to specifically discuss the exempt information to allow the hearing to be held in public.
The application had attracted a total of 25 objections and one letter of support.
Members noted that none of the objectors had attended the hearing and therefore resolved to consider the written objections contained within the documents before them and proceed in the absence of the objectors.
At the outset it was clarified that one of the members of the Sub Committee had been on the working group of the Licensing Committee in relation to the new Policy.
The members confirmed that they all came to deal with this application with an open mind.
The Legal Adviser, having outlined the procedure for the hearing, indicated that the Sub Committee sought clarity from the applicant’s presentation on the following issues: · How long the venue had traded as a lap dancing venue · Issues arising from any compliance visits · Clarity on whether any fining policy existed · The number of dancers and the number of customers attending the venue
Miss Roth acting on behalf of the applicant, referred to additional information that had been prepared in relation to the application and requested that this information be accepted by to the Sub-Committee. The Sub-Committee requested a short adjournment to the hearing to consider the request. .
Following the adjournment, Members resolved not to accept the further information that the applicant sought to submit but that reference could be made to those documents as part of the applicant’s submission to the Sub-Committee.
The Licensing Officer presented the report of the Head of Licensing and Registration.
At the outset of her presentation, Miss Roth informed the Sub-Committee of proposed changes to operation at the premises. Ms Roth was advised ... view the full minutes text for item 27. |