Venue: Civic Hall, Leeds
Contact: Helen Gray 247 4355
No. | Item |
---|---|
Election of Chair Minutes: RESOLVED – Councillor G Hussain was elected Chair for the duration of the hearing
Present at the hearing were:
For Purple Door
Mr John Coen, Ford & Warren – solicitor representing the applicant Ms R MacIntosh - observer Mr J Adshead - observer Mr M Nicholson – Witness/Chartered Surveyor Mr M Hartley - observer Mr S Tredigo - manager and DPS Mr R Monty –manager Mr M Makrinakis - Assistant Manager Mr N Quadrini – Director of Ruby May 2
Observers Mr P Whur Mr P Gourlay
|
|
Exempt Information - Possible Exclusion of the Press and Public 1) To highlight reports or appendices which:
a) officers have identified as containing exempt information, and where officers consider that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, for the reasons outlined in the report.
b) To consider whether or not to accept the officers recommendation in respect of the above information.
c) If so, to formally pass the following resolution:-
RESOLVED – That the press and public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of those parts of the agenda designated as containing exempt information on the grounds that it is likely, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted or the nature of the proceedings, that if members of the press and public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information
2) To note that under the Licensing Procedure Rules, the press and the public will be excluded from that part of the hearing where Members will deliberate on each application as it is in the public interest to allow the Members to have a full and frank debate on the matter before them.
Minutes: The Sub Committee felt that the hearing should be held in the public domain and agreed that wherever possible, specific reference to the contents of the exempt information contained within Appendix B of the report should not be referred to, however if it became necessary, the public and press would be excluded from the meeting as follows:
RESOLVED – That the public be excluded from the meeting during consideration of that part of the agenda designated as exempt information on the grounds that it is likely, in view of the nature of the business to be transacted or the nature of the proceedings, that if members of the public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information as contained in Appendix B of the report referred to in Minute No. 5 in terms of the Licensing Procedure Rules, and on the grounds that it is not in the public interest to disclose the contents as the information therein pertains to an individual and that person would not reasonably expect their personal information or discussions thereon to be in the public domain.
|
|
Late Items Minutes: No formal late items of business were added to the agenda for the meeting, however a supplementary document relating to agenda item 5 – application in respect of “Purple Door” - had been supplied by the applicant and had been despatched to members prior to the hearing (Minute No.5 refers).
It was noted that Appendix H of the submitted report referred to the standard conditions of the previous Sex Establishment policy and for the avoidance of doubt, a replacement Appendix H which related to the Licensing of Sex Establishments Statement of Licensing Policy (“the Policy”) adopted in September 2013 was circulated at the meeting.
|
|
Declarations of Disclosable Pecuniary Interests Members are reminded to disclose or draw attention to any disclosable pecuniary interests at the start of the hearing on each application for the purposes of Section 31 of the Localism Act 2011 and paragraphs 13-16 of the Members Code of Conduct Minutes: There were no declarations of disclosable pecuniary interest
|
|
To consider the report of the Head of Licensing and Registration on an application made under Section 2 and Schedule 3 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982 for the renewal of a Sex Establishment Licence for the premises known as Purple Door, 5 York Place, Leeds LS1.
Please note that Appendix B of the report is regarded as exempt from publication under the provisions of Access to Information Procedure Rule 10.4 (1, 2 &3)
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Licensing Sub Committee considered the report of the Head of Licensing and Registration on an application made under Section 2 and Schedule 3 of the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982 for the renewal of a Sex Establishment Licence. The application was made by Ruby May (2) Limited, Unit 40 Low Friar House, Lower Friar Street, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 5UF relating to the premises known as `Purple Door’, 5 York Place, Leeds. The basement and ground floors are to be covered under the provisions of the licence with proposed hours of operation of 22:00 until 04:00 hours Sunday to Thursday and 22:00 until 05:00 hours Friday and Saturday.
The report on the application included the following documentation which Members considered during their deliberations:
Members also had access to an A3 city centre map showing the location of the premises.
Appendix B of the report was exempt from publication under Access to Information Procedure Rule 10.4 (1, 2 & 3), however the Sub Committee resolved not to specifically discuss the exempt information to allow the hearing to be held in public.
The application attracted a total of 25 objections and one letter of support.
Members noted that none of the objectors attended the hearing and therefore resolved to consider the written objections contained within the documents before them and proceed in the absence of the objectors
The Sub Committee said that the renewal application would be considered having regard to the revised Statement of Licensing Policy adopted by the Council which came into force on 01 09 2013. The conditions within the revised Policy were contained in Appendix H. It was noted that the existing conditions for the current licence granted under the former policy were also included within the report
At the outset it was clarified that one of the members of the Sub Committee had been on the working group of the Licensing Committee in relation to the new Policy.
The members confirmed that they all came to deal with this application with an open mind.
In the first instance the Sub Committee sought to clarify two matters:
The Sub Committee heard from Mr Coen on behalf of the applicant who addressed the following points:
|