The Assistant Chief
Executive (Corporate Governance) submitted a report on the outcome
and findings of the Multi-Agency meeting held in October 2008 after
the Leeds Festival. The report included
minutes from the multi agency meeting and appendices from the
various agencies involved in preparations for the Festival.
Officers reported that all agencies had been satisfied with the
event with the exception of traffic problems experienced on the
Thursday of the event.
The Committee then
heard from representatives of each of the relevant
agencies
LCC Environmental Health Services
- Reported receipt of
18 complaints in total, broadly split between daytime and night
time. The night time calls were made just after the 23:00 hours
deadline for reduction of audibility, the bulk of which were from
the Barwick-in-Elmet area. Investigations found the noise level was
not a statutory nuisance and was not required to be recorded within
the complainants’ properties. Complaints received after the
event had finished could not be investigated. One complaint
received from Whinmoor had been investigated from within the
complainants’ property but was not deemed a statutory
nuisance.
- Mr Benn added that
Festival Republic had despatched 1400 information leaflets to the
residents of Barwick containing telephone contact numbers to ring
in the event of noise disturbance and overall he was pleased so few
complaints were made
- Members felt this was
encouraging however did query whether the campsite DJ stations had
played music between 20:00 to 21:00 hours. Mr Benn reported the DJ
stations primarily provided entertainment after the live acts had
concluded. However he confirmed this had occurred and noted the
music had not been absorbed as no one was present in the campsite
during that time. He reported that DJ entertainment would be
re-scheduled to commence at 23:00 hours next year. Furthermore, the
testing of the DJ equipment occurred during Wednesday Thursday
early evening and no complaints had been received then
LCC Health &
Safety
- Officers confirmed
they were happy with the management of health and safety
issues.
- One concern regarding
disabled ramp access had been raised and had been dealt with.
Officers reported that considering the adverse weather, the
organisers had dealt with all issues well and had responded
positively to all requests made of them.
- Members commented on
the state of the ground around the water points due to the heavy
rain and suggested that adverse weather should have been accounted
for, however noted in previous dry years dust had been a
problem.
- Mr Benn responded
that he intended to provide new water point facilities in the form
of a steel portacabin raised off the ground with a tray underneath
for water run off.
West Yorkshire
Police
- Reported another
successful year in terms of the reduction on the number of reported
crimes and excellent CCTV coverage. There had been very good
liaison between WYP and Festival Republic and LCC officers were
also commended
LCC Highways
Services
Committee Members
whose wards had been directly affected by traffic congestion during
the festival site made the following comments
- The Ring Road, A58,
A64 and local routes experienced chaotic congestion with vehicles
queuing through the suburbs for up to seven hours. This in turn
affected city centre traffic
- Local residents in
the Crossgates, Seacroft and Whinmoor areas experienced festival
visitors toileting in their gardens and unacceptable delays getting
to work/returning home
- Reported a lack of
traffic police and traffic marshals on main highways
- Regretted the lack of
a contingency plan to cater for the backlog of traffic
- Noted that some
festival goers utilised SatNav systems which meant that all routes
within the local wards were being used by festival
traffic
- Complaints that
removal of signage particularly at the Colton A1/M1/Ring Road
junction was not dealt with when it became obvious that standing
traffic effectively cut off one festival route
- Expressed total
dissatisfaction with the Traffic Management Plan (TMP) which they
believed was ineffective and would not have been successful even if
the weather had been good
- Requested local ward
Councillors be consulted on the future TMP
- Expressed concern
that they had been given misinformation about the routes, believing
that most traffic would be directed up the A1 and off at the new
junction, however this had not been the case
- Local residents from
the East Leeds wards had made complaint to local ward Councillors
and comments had also been received from residents of villages
around Thorner
The Committee
supported all of the comments made by the ward Councillors and
expressed the desire to ensure that an LCC officer was appointed to
take overall responsibility for the highways network during the
event. Members also sought to ensure that local ward Councillors
were involved with the TMP in future along with the relevant
Executive Member.
Mr Benn responded to
the comments
- agreed
with Members comments regarding traffic problems and confirmed the
opening of the new A1 bypass had not
had the positive impact anticipated
- the
heavy rain had made a difference to the traffic routes. The
subsequent flooding and closure of the A64 brought all routes to a
standstill. A specialist fire service pump was brought in to pump
the water away and this left the routes gridlocked from which it
took a long time to recover
- responsibility for the highways lay with LCC and Festival
Republic as it was no longer the domain of WYP
- a
number of elements had created difficulties - the failure of the
new A1 bypass to have an impact, the retirement of the WYP
transport planner had left a vacuum in that post. That officer had
then been employed by Festival Republic and to an extent there had
been a level of assumption that this particular officer would be
able to deal with all highways matters effectively, but
unfortunately this had not been the case. The TMP had been in place
for 5 years, there had not been an effective contingency plan in
place and finally the impact of the adverse weather.
- Currently all festival traffic was brought through Leeds and
guided up to the festival via the Ring Road.
- Ideally he would prefer to close the eastbound A64 for the peak
period of traffic (Thursday) and re-organise the route so that all
festival traffic entered from the eastern side at the A64.
Historically LCC highways had not favoured this approach as it
required a right turn across oncoming traffic; however discussion
on this route was now likely due to the problems experienced this
year. Mr Benn believed this option would still allow for local
traffic flow for residents
- A
traffic consultant had been commissioned and would present an
assessment to Highways at future
discussions on the proposed route
- A
separate meeting with East Leeds Councillors was welcomed to
discuss the TMP at an early stage
- No
senior officer took individual responsibility for traffic as this
was shared by LCC, the Highways Agency and Motorways. He had now
reached an informal agreement with The Highways Agency and
Motorways to discuss coning off lanes on the M1/A1 approach
specifically for festival traffic
- Traffic spotters employed by Festival Republic had been in place
during the event
Inspector Griffiths
confirmed his belief that the rain had severely restricted the
ability of vehicles to enter the site. Traffic Police had
marshalled the traffic at the points where blockages occurred
rather than further back down in standing traffic. Furthermore,
there was an LCC officer in charge of highways during the event who
liaised between the responsible agencies. In conclusion he
expressed his support for the highways officer present.
The Highways Officer
confirmed that historically LCC and the Highways Agency had not
favoured closing the A64 as traffic would become static on the
A1/M1 motorway network, however agreement to discuss the proposal
had now been reached including the creation of 2 designated lanes
(out of the 5) for festival traffic at the A1/M1 junction.
Additionally senior management would discuss the traffic assessment
based on the A64 closure proposal. Officers believed the new route
along with the provision of another access gate to the event would
be successful and would also afford a sustainable alternative route
(A1/M1) if this failed.
The Committee
requested the TMP be presented to a future meeting once the
proposed route had been mapped out following discussions between
relevant parties; the ward Councillors and Executive Member.
Members requested the attendance of the Senior Highways Officer at
that meeting.
To conclude Mr Benn
confirmed that festival tickets did refer to authorised routes to
the event site. He also reported that in future he would ensure the
postcode of the relevant access gate was issued for the reference
of SatNav users. Mr Benn offered to undertake press releases in
local media advising Leeds residents of likely routes and road
closures prior to next years event.
The Committee whilst
noting the traffic problems experienced in 2008 welcomed the
contents of the report and comments of officers which signified the
overall success of the event
RESOLVED –
a)
to thank Mr Benn and officers for their attendance
b)
to note the contents of the report
c)
to request that elected local ward Councillors, the appropriate
Executive Member and relevant parish councils be consulted on the
Traffic Management Plan, noting that Committee supported the
proposals to avoid the use of the A64/Ring Road