Agenda item

Call In - Garforth Squash and Leisure Centre

In accordance with Scrutiny Board Procedure Rules, to review a decision of the Executive Board regarding Garforth Squash and Leisure Centre.

Minutes:

The Head of Scrutiny and Member Development submitted a report, together with background papers, relating to a review of a decision made by the Executive Board on 30th March 2011 in relation to ‘Garforth Squash and Leisure Centre’.

 

Appended to the report were copies of the following documents for the information/comment of the meeting:-

 

  • Copy of the completed call-in request form
  • Garforth Squash and Leisure Centre – Report of the Acting Director of City Development submitted to the Executive Board meeting held on 30th March 2011
  • Relevant extract of the Executive Board minutes of 30th March 2011

 

The decision had been called-in for review by Councillors A Lamb, D Schofield, B Anderson, C Fox and P Harrand on the following grounds:-

 

·  A lack of clarity of aims and outcomes

·  Insufficient information and lack of explanation of all the options considered and details of the reason for the decision taken by the Executive Board

·  A lack of openness and transparency and concerns as to what was being proposed

·  The 2000 plus named petition of local residents showing the level of local concern

·  The lack of a business plan and opportunity to other possible providers

·  Concerns about the overall process, particularly the level of detail in the Executive Board report

 

Councillors A Lamb and D Schofield attended the meeting and gave evidence to the Board as to why they had called this item in and responded to Members’ questions and comments.

 

The following representatives were also in attendance:-

 

Councillor A Ogilvie, Executive Member with portfolio responsibility for leisure

Martin Farrington, Acting Director of City Development

Richard Mond, Chief Recreation Officer, City Development

Mark Allman,  Head of Sport and Active Recreation, City Development

 

In summary, the main points raised by Councillors A Lamb and D Schofield  were the need:-

 

·  The concerns about the overall process, particularly the level of accurate detail in the Executive Board report

·  That discussions were ongoing with the School Partnership Trust regarding the lease and potential business plan of the Garforth Squash Club and Leisure Centre which, again, was not reflected within the Executive Board report

·  That Garforth Squash and Leisure Centre was viewed as a valuable asset to the Community

·  That, in view of the above reasons, the Executive Board report should be referred back for re-consideration

 

In explaining the reasons for the Executive Board decision, Councillor Ogilvie and officers made the following comments:-

 

·  The need to progress a proposal for community asset transfer for Garforth Sports Centre resulting from a reduction in the sports budget for 2011/12

·  The need to recognise that timing was an issue in securing the continuation of a community resource in Garforth

·  To recognise that a business plan would be brought forward in due course

 

The Chair then invited questions and comments from Board Members be put to Councillors Lamb and Schofield, the Executive Board Member and officers on the evidence submitted.

 

In summary, the main areas of discussion were:-

 

·  Clarification of the discussions to date between the School Partnership Trust and the Garforth Academy

·  Clarification of the process to date, together with the involvement between the local Ward Member, the Trust and officers on this issue

·  Clarification of the process in relation to the business plan and whether or not consideration had been given to introducing a Plan ‘B’  should the current proposals not go ahead

·  Clarification of the Community Asset transfer process and the leasing arrangements

·  Clarification of the future of the bodyline service provided at Garforth Squash and Leisure Centre

·  Clarification of the heads of terms that had been drafted and shared with the School Partnership Trust and the reassurances sought that the terms were not similar to the PFI programme

·  Clarification of the repairs required at Garforth Squash Club  and Leisure Centre estimated to be £348, 650 and whether the Schools Partnership Trust would be responsible for these under the ‘repairing obligation’ set out in the Heads of Terms

 

Following this process, the Chair allowed officers and the Call-In signatories to sum up.

 

In conclusion, the Chair thanked Councillors Lamb and Schofield, together with Councillor Ogilvie and officers for their attendance and contribution to the call in meeting.

 

RESOLVED- That the report and information provided be noted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supporting documents: