To consider the report of the Head of Licensing and Registration on an application for a premises licence for Cocktail Bar, 30 Call Lane, Leeds LS1. The premise lies within an area covered by a Cumulative Impact Area
(Report attached)
Minutes:
The Sub Committee, having regard to the Licensing Act 2003, the Section 182 Guidance and the Authority’s own Statement of Licensing Policy considered an application for the grant of a premises licence for Cocktail Bar, 39 Call Lane, Leeds, LS1 7BT.
Representations had been received by West Yorkshire Police (WYP) objecting to the application in light of the premises being within an area affected by the Cumulative Impact Policy.
Representations were received by Leeds City Council Environmental Protection Team.
Representations were also received by Leeds City Council Health and Safety Service however the measures proposed had been agreed by the applicant and the representation subsequently withdrawn on the understanding that those measures would appear on the premises licence as conditions should the application be granted.
The hearing was attended by the following:
- Alexander William Neil, Proposed Licence Holder;
- Christopher Neil, Supporter;
- Jonathan Neil, Supporter;
- PC Kath Arkle, West Yorkshire Police
Christopher Neil addressed the Sub Committee and made the following points:
PC Cath Arkle, West Yorkshire Police, addressed the Sub Committee and made the following points:
Brian Kenny, Leeds City Council, Environmental Protection Service, addressed the Sub – Committee and made the following points:
In summing up the applicant made the following key points:
The Sub Committee then carefully considered all the written and verbal submissions and made the following decision:
RESOLVED – To refuse the application for the following reasons:
The Committee considered the Leeds City Council Cumulative Impact Policy and heard the full objections from West Yorkshire Police and the Environmental Protection Service and the particular problems in this area which has now reached saturation point. The Licensing Subcommittee is mindful that this is a new additional premises in the area that will impact on the cumulative impact in the area. The decision of the Licensing Subcommittee is that the applicants have not demonstrated that their application would not add to the cumulative impact of such premises in the area and therefore refused the application.
Supporting documents: