Agenda item

Application 11/03655/FU - Change of use of ground floor offices to A3 (Restaurant), extensions to form two A3 units, extension to Casino and construction of 102 Bedroom Serviced Apartments, Merrion Way, Brunswick Terrace and Tower House Street, Leeds

To consider the report of the Chief Planning Officer on an application for the change of use of ground floor offices to A3 (Restaurant) use, extensions to form two A3 units, extension of an existing casino and construction of 102 bedroomed serviced apartment block at Merrion Way, Brunswick Terrace and Tower House Street, Leeds

 

(Report attached)

Minutes:

Plans, architects drawings and photographs of the site were displayed at the meeting along with computer generated graphics showing the development in situ. Plans showing the footprint of the current buildings were displayed for comparison with the proposals. Members had visited the site prior to the meeting.

 

Officers outlined the proposals which included new active frontages to Brunswick Terrace, ground and first floor extensions to the casino, new shopfronts and recladding of the podium building, construction of a part 6 and part 10 storey serviced apartment building, a new entrance into Tower House and important public realm around the site which is pivotal to the regeneration of the area. The uses would help to reinforce the function of this part of the city centre as a major leisure and visitor centre.  Key issues to consider were highlighted as being:

 

Buildings

·  The resurfacing of the terrace over the basement car park, together with extended public realm to the side (enabled by the infilling of the existing ramp) and rear (enabled by the removal of the surface car park) to improve pedestrian access and the appearance of the area.

·  The delivery of a series of meaningful steps in building mass rising towards Tower House.

·  The protection and framing of key views of the arena at ground and upper levels.

·  The use of a calm monochromatic palette of materials responding to the form of the existing buildings whilst avoiding conflict with the detail of the arena building to the rear.

·  The recladding of the base of Tower House to form a positive base to the building.

·  The provision of a comprehensive lighting scheme around the development adding additional interest to the building and evening environment.

Public realm

·  Footways around the periphery of the site to be resurfaced with materials consistent with those to be used at the Merrion Centre and the arena.

·  Concrete steps outside Tower House to be replaced with granite steps.

·  Railings to the front of the podium to be replaced with a clear balustrade to present a more open vista.

·  New planting and seating proposals on the terrace and two trees to the front of Tower House as an extension to existing trees to the front of the terrace.

 

Computer generated graphics showing the development in the street scene were displayed, including night time views showing the lighting scheme which incorporated a crown of uplighters to Tower House and horizontal strip lighting to the podium elevations.

 

The Panel noted that any development proposals were constrained by the podium building - which would not support any vertical extensions and was leased until 2037. Members commented that any development here should be of the highest quality and discussed the following matters:

  • the apart/hotel was intended for stays of up to 90 days
  • the single width extension provided rooms facing Brunswick Terrace connected by a single corridor which faced onto Merrion Way
  • queried whether there was a need for the apart/hotel element
  • Some Members voiced concern that the apart/hotel extension obscured the view of the Arena from the south and expressed the opinion that the iconic design of the Arena should retain views around it.
  • The need to reconsider the current siting of the disabled parking bays on Brunswick Terrace as this would be a busy pedestrian route. Officers reported that provision of the disabled parking bays was outside the remit of this developer, however discussions had begun with the Arena developer on their possible removal
  •  Members had regard to the width and future use of Brunswick Terrace once the proposed tall buildings were developed and queried whether a wind assessment had been undertaken. Officers reported the results of a survey had found a neutral /slightly positive impact and a proposed condition required measures to mitigate any adverse impact.

 

(Councillor Jarosz withdrew from the meeting for a short time at this point)

 

Members generally welcomed the principle of the redevelopment and proposed use of the site but remained concerned about its impact on views of the Arena and commented that although the redevelopment would improve Brunswick Terrace and the existing buildings, the design was uninspiring and presented a missed opportunity.

 

Officers referred to the Unitary Development Plan which earmarked this site where development of this type and scale was encouraged and to previous Panel discussions on the Arena development when Members had supported the suggestion that the Arena would be set in a landscape of tall buildings.  Officers concluded that the Arena would remain a focal point, with only the oblique view of the southern Arena elevation partially obscured by the proposals before Panel. Officers outlined the discussions held between the developer and the Design Team to achieve these proposals.

 

Some Members were concerned over the design of the narrow apart/hotel extension and commented that too much was being proposed for the site. Members considered whether the apart/hotel could be moved eastwards to reveal more of the Arena. The Panel noted a comment that the treatment of the Merrion Way end elevation of the apart/hotel presented an attractive frame and whether a similar treatment would benefit the other elevations of the apart/hotel. Members also noted a comment that a taller build adjacent to Tower House could be acceptable if the apart/hotel extension was lower or moved back.

 

The Panel noted the officer recommendation to defer and delegate approval to the Chief Planning Officer, however were not minded to do so

RESOLVED – To defer determination of the application for one cycle to allow time for further discussion with the developers on the issues raised by Panel, namely the scale, position and design of the apart/hotel element to the rear of the podium.

 

Supporting documents: