To consider a report from the Chief Executive, Education Leeds on the future of Primrose, City of Leeds, Parklands Girls’ High Schools and of Girls Only Secondary Education in Leeds.
Minutes:
The Chief Executive, Education Leeds submitted a report on the future of Primrose, City Of Leeds, Parklands Girls High Schools and of Girls Only Secondary Education in Leeds.
Appended to the report was a copy of a document entitled ‘Report of the Chief Executive of Education Leeds – Executive Board – 6th January 2010 – The Future of Primrose, City of Leeds, Parklands Girls’ High Schools, and of Girls Only Secondary Education in Leeds’ for the information/comment of the meeting.
The following officers were in attendance and responded to Members’ queries and comments:-
Pat Toner, Director of Organisational Improvement, Education Leeds
Richard Smith, Head of Service, Education Leeds
The Director of Organisational Improvement provided the meeting with the relevant background information and reminded Members that the main purpose of this report was to enable the Area Committee to:-
In summary, specific reference was made to the following issues:-
· clarification of how Elected Members can comment on the proposals
(The Director of Organisational Improvement responded outlining the following courses of action available:-
- Elected Members to register their views
- write in with a specific response to the proposals
- via minutes of the Area Committee meeting)
· reference to a recent Yorkshire Evening Post article listing the
performance of a number of schools within the NW Inner ward
(The Director of Organisational Improvement responded and made specific reference to the poor performance at the City of Leeds High School)
· clarification on how closing the City of Leeds High School
and moving these pupils to a another nearby school would generate better achievement and results in the long term
· the need for the Area Committee to see evidence ‘for and against’
regarding the reorganisation proposals
(The Director of Organisational Improvement noted the specific points made by the Area Committee)
· the need for a full review of the proposals to be undertaken at the City
of Leeds High School with a specific focus on BME and exam results
(The Director of Organisational Improvement responded and outlined the departments views around achievement and improved learning outcomes. He stated that unlike other schools in the area, the City of Leeds High School had not significantly improved it’s performance over an eight year period as other schools in Leeds had done)
· clarification of how Education Leeds had addressed the reasons why
pupils had not achieved at the City Of Leeds High School, including
extra-curricular pursuits
· clarification on how moving these pupils would impact the nearby
schools of Lawnswood and Carr Manor
(The Area Committee noted the response given)
· clarification of the number of pupils from the Headingley area who
attend the City of Leeds High School and details of the feeder schools
should the City of Leeds High School result in closure.
(The Director of Organisational Improvement responded and informed
the meeting that, in the first instance, places would be sought in the
school nearest to where the children lived, including Lawnswood and
Carr Manor. In relation to the number of pupils from the Headingley
area, he agreed to circulate this information to the Area Committee via
the Acting West North West Area Manager)
· clarification of the Government’s view in relation to targets
(The Director of Organisational Improvement responded and briefly
outlined the current pressures facing the city in relation to
those schools who were not hitting the benchmark. The department
had considered structural changes and new leadership proposals as
part of the current reorganisation process, but in relation to the City of
Leeds High School, closure was considered to be the best option at this
present time)
· the view expressed that structural changes make some schools
unviable
(The Director of Organisational Improvement responded and acknowledged this statement)
· the need for the Area Committee to be supplied with details on how
travel would be affected by reorganisation proposals
RESOLVED –
a) That the content of the report and appendices be noted.
b) That the comments made at the meeting be fed into the consultation process and that Members of the Committee be encouraged to forward any further comments to the Chief Executive, Education Leeds.
(Councillor J Monaghan left the meeting at 5.25pm during discussions of the above item)
Supporting documents: