214 Eastgate Quarter - Amendment to Legal Documentation and Commercial Deal PDF 73 KB
To consider the report of the Director of City Development seeking approval to revise the terms of the Eastgate Development Agreement with Hammerson, who have requested that the Development Agreement be reviewed and that revised terms are agreed in order to facilitate the delivery of the project.
Both Appendix A and Plan 1 to this report are designated as exempt under Access to Information Procedure Rule 10.4(3).
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Further to Minute No. 181, 9th March, 2011, the Director of City Development submitted a report seeking approval to revise the terms of the Eastgate Development Agreement with Hammerson, who have requested that the Development Agreement was reviewed and that the revised terms agreed, in order to facilitate the delivery of the project. In determining this matter, the Board took into consideration all matters contained within the accompanying report.
In introducing the report, the Executive Member for Development and the Economy referred to the correspondence which had been received from the Friends of Kirkgate Market and the Leeds Kirkgate Branch of the National Market Traders’ Federation and acknowledged the points raised in respect of details within the report regarding consultation.
The Board reiterated its support for the Eastgate development project, and emphasised the extra retail offer, together with the significant employment and training opportunities which would be established as a result.
Following consideration of both Appendix A and Plan 1 to the submitted report, designated as exempt under Access to Information Procedure Rule 10.4(3), which were considered in private at the conclusion of the meeting, it was
RESOLVED -
(a) That the contents of the submitted report, together with the current position of the project, be noted.
(b) That the Heads of Terms, as set out within the submitted report for the variation of the Development Agreement, be approved.
(c) That the Director of City Development and the City Solicitor be authorised to conclude all the documents required to amend the existing Development Agreement in accordance with the submitted report, and that the Director of City Development and the City Solicitor be authorised to agree any further alterations that might be required, in consultation with the Executive Member for Development and the Economy and in accordance with the appropriate schemes of delegation.
(The matters referred to within this minute were not eligible for Call In, as under the Council’s Constitution, a decision may be declared as being exempt from Call In if it is considered that any delay in implementing the decision would seriously prejudice the Council’s or the public interest. Any delay in completing the legal documentation as soon as practically possible may have an impact on the critical path of approvals which are being sought both from Hammerson and John Lewis Boards in March)