THAT this Council congratulates the residents of Woodhouse and Hyde Park and their supporters in preserving Woodhouse Moor from the planned car parking scheme; deplores their local Lib-Dem councillors for not listening to their residents views and calls upon the ruling administration to use the £163,000 allocated for the car parking scheme on the refurbishments of Woodhouse Moor.
B ATHA
Minutes:
It was moved by Councillor Atha seconded by Councillor Ogilvie
That this Council congratulates the residents of Woodhouse and Hyde
Park and their supporters in preserving Woodhouse Moor from the planned car parking scheme; deplores their local Lib-Dem councillors for not listening to their residents views and calls upon the ruling administration to use the £163,000 allocated for the car parking scheme on the refurbishments of Woodhouse Moor
An amendment was moved by Councillor J Procter seconded by Councillor M Hamilton
After “That this Council congratulates the” delete all and replace with
“administration on its Park Renaissance Programme and welcomes the fact that the administration and local members listened to the concerns of local residents and revised the plan for Woodhouse Moor. This Council also congratulates the administration for their proposals to invest in enhancing Woodhouse Moor through a lottery grant application which will be the subject of intensive consultation with local residents.”
The amendment was carried and upon being put to the vote as the substantive motion it was
RESOLVED – That this Council congratulates the administration on its Park Renaissance Programme and welcomes the fact that the administration and local members listened to the concerns of local residents and revised the plan for Woodhouse Moor. This Council also congratulates the administration for their proposals to invest in enhancing Woodhouse Moor through a lottery grant application which will be the subject of intensive consultation with local residents.
On the requisition of Councillors Hanley and Selby the voting on the amendment was recorded as follows:
YES
Akhtar, Anderson, Andrew, Bale, Barker, Bentley, A Blackburn, D Blackburn, Brett, Campbell, A Carter, J L Carter, Mrs A Carter, Castle, Chapman, Cleasby, Downes, Ewens, Mrs R Feldman, R D Feldman, Fox, Golton, M Hamilton, Harker, Harrand, Harris, Hollingsworth, Hussain, W Hyde, Kendall, Kirkland, Lancaster, Latty, Lobley, McArdle, Millard, Monaghan, Morton, Phillips, J Procter, Pryke, Rhodes-Clayton, Robinson, Russell, Schofield, Shelbrooke, Smith, Taylor, Townsley, Wadsworth, Wilkinson, Wilson
52
NO
Armitage, Atha, Atkinson, Blake, Congreve, Coulson, Coupar, Davey, Dowson, Driver, Gabriel, Grahame, Gruen, Hanley, Harington, Harper, Harrison, Illingworth, Jarosz, J Lewis, R Lewis, Lowe, Lyons, McKenna, Minkin, Morgan, Mulherin, Murray, Nash, Ogilvie, Rafique, Renshaw, Selby, Wakefield
34
ABSTAIN
Beverley, Elliot, Finnigan, Grayshon, Leadley
5
On the requisition of Councillor J Procter and Atha the voting on the substantive motion was recorded as follows:
YES
Akhtar, Anderson, Andrew, Bale, Barker, Bentley, A Blackburn, D Blackburn, Brett, Campbell, A Carter, J L Carter, Mrs A Carter, Castle, Chapman, Cleasby, Downes, Ewens, Mrs R Feldman, R D Feldman, Fox, Golton, M Hamilton, Harker, Harrand, Harris, Hollingsworth, Hussain, W Hyde, Kendall, Kirkland, Lancaster, Latty, Lobley, McArdle, Millard, Monaghan, Morton, Phillips, J Procter, Pryke, Rhodes-Clayton, Robinson, Russell, Schofield, Shelbrooke, Smith, Taylor, Townsley, Wadsworth, Wilkinson, Wilson
52
NO
Armitage, Atha, Atkinson, Blake, Congreve, Coulson, Coupar, Davey, Dowson, Driver, Gabriel, Grahame, Gruen, Hanley, Harington, Harper, Harrison, Illingworth, Jarosz, J Lewis, R Lewis, Lowe, Lyons, McKenna, Minkin, Morgan, Mulherin, Murray, Nash, Ogilvie, Rafique, Renshaw, Selby, Wakefield
34
ABSTAIN
Beverley, Elliot, Finnigan, Grayshon, Leadley
5