To consider a report of the Director of City Development on public consultation into the Post Submission Schedule of Changes regarding the Natural Resources and Waste Development Plan Document.
Minutes:
The Director of City Development submitted a report on public consultation into the Post Submission Schedule of Changes regarding the Natural Resources and Waste Development Plan Document.
Appended to the report were copies of the following documents for the information/comment of the meeting:-
(Appendix 3 refers)
The Chair welcomed the following officers to present the report and to respond to Members’ questions and comments:-
- David Feeney, Head of Forward Planning and Implementation, City Development
- Max Rathmell, Minerals, Waste and Contaminated Land Manager, City Development
Prior to discussing the issue, the Head of Forward Planning and Implementation outlined the background issues and process undertaken to date.
It was noted that this report would be considered at the Executive Board meeting on 11th April 2012 and that a further sustainability appraisal of the proposals would be submitted to Members prior to Executive Board.
It was further noted that a schedule of any further changes would be collated in due course and that further waste guidance would be issued later in the year.
In concluding his presentation, the Head of Forward Planning and Implementation outlined the key issues in the post Submission Schedule of Changes and sought Members specific views on the content.
Detailed discussion ensued on the contents of the report and appendices.
In summary, the key areas of discussion were:-
Arising from discussions and points of clarification, the Minerals, Waste and Contaminated Land Manager provided the meeting with specific information relating to the above issues and also regarding the Minerals 2 Mineral Safeguarding Area Policy.
RESOLVED-
a) That the contents of the report and appendices be noted.
b) That Executive Board be asked to agree the Post Submission Schedule of Changes for a six week period of public consultation, and to authorise the Director of City Development to take such steps as he considers necessary to progress the Development Plan Document (DPD) in the light of any representations received and the Inspector’s considerations of these, prior to the Inspector issuing the report.
Supporting documents: