Agenda item

PREAPP/17/00261 - Pre-application Presentation for the erection of 515 apartments in two buildings between 8 and 17 storeys with associated landscaping, open space areas, public routes and basement car parking, to be located on the northern side of Quarry Hill, Leeds

To consider a report by the Chief Planning Officer which sets out details of a Pre-application Presentation (PREAPP/17/00261) for the erection of 515 apartments in two buildings between 8 and 17 storeys with associated landscaping, open space areas, public routes and basement car parking, to be located on the northern side of Quarry Hill, Leeds

 

(Report attached)

Minutes:

The Chief Planning Officer submitted a report which sets out details of a

Pre-application proposal for the erection of 515 apartments in two buildings between 8 and 17 storeys with associated landscaping, open space areas, public routes and basement car parking to be located on the northern side of Quarry Hill, Leeds 1.

 

Site photographs and plans were displayed and referred to throughout the discussion of the application.

 

The Chief Planning Officer together with the applicant’s representatives addressed the Panel, speaking in detail about the proposal and highlighted the following:

 

·  The proposed development runs through the centre of the Quarry Hill site, linking Eastgate roundabout to Quarry House. It currently consists of a mix of hard and soft landscaped areas with a central pathway containing steps and ramps with vacant and cleared sites to either side. The sites have vehicular access from the A64 York Rd/Inner Ring Road to the north and from York Street to the south. The sites are currently used as surface car parking with approximately 417 car parking spaces available.

·  To the west is the West Yorkshire Play House (WYPH) and to the south are the Leeds College of Music (LCM) and its associated student residential tower and the Northern Ballet HQ. Pedestrian access is gained from the west using the existing set of pedestrian steps and ramp arrangement to Eastgate roundabout which is outside the application site. A pedestrian bridge across the A64 to Mabgate is accessed from the north-eastern corner of Quarry Hill.

·  This proposed design amendment relates to a part of the wider Quarry Hill outline planning application site, and is located on the northern side of the east/west route from Eastgate to Quarry House. As part of the outline proposal this was to be occupied by 2 buildings (Building E to the east and Building F to the west) both of 8 storeys fronting the main route and rising to 14 storeys at the rear, to the north. They were proposed to contain approximately 428 no. residential units. These buildings, which were both U-shaped in plan, created a central courtyard space with a route running north/south between them. The current proposal retains this basic format but with the following amendments:

 

·  An increase in the width of the space between building E and F from 10.6m to 13m

·  An increase in the height of the northern part of both buildings from 14 storeys, in the case of Building F to 16 storeys and in the case of Building E to 17 storeys – an increase of between 6m and 9m. Also an increase in the height of the side wings by up to 2m

·  An increase in the number of residential units from 428 to 515.

·  A rationalisation of the ground floor plan to remove original corner recesses and reveals

·  Modification of the colonnade height frontage to the east/west route, from 7m down to 6m

·  Redesigned landscape to the central route to integrate all changes of levels into a fully accessible design, including soft landscaping, pedestrian routes and space in front of the units to be used for seating and dining. In addition, because it is no longer to be constructed above a basement car park, a more robust planting regime can be pursued.

·  A reduction in the basement car parking numbers to 73 for the Phase 1 residential (including 4 disabled bays and 8 Electric Vehicle bays)

·  234 cycle spaces in 2 dedicated secure locations accessible at ground level

·  It is also proposed that Building D, closest to the WYPH, would have the potential to be used as a hotel, as an option to the office use already agreed in principle.

·  The residential units would be available on the rental market as part of a Private Rented Sector (PRS) scheme. This would mean that some of the ground floor uses would be dedicated to the occupiers of the apartments rather than being available to the general public, although this would only be for a proportion of the space and not all of it.

 

In response to Members questions, the following were raised:

 

·  Affordable Housing Provision (5%)

·  Car Parking Provision and provision of the public multi-storey car park

·  Did the apartment size comply with national standards

·  Education provision within the area

·  Had a wind impact assessment been undertaken

·  Further details were required about the lighting of the public realm area

·  Further details of the landscaping scheme were required

·  Could there be a contribution towards cultural activities/ projects within the area and how the scheme could contribute to the European Capital of Culture 2023 Bid

 

In responding to the issues raised, the Chief Planning Officer/ applicant’s representatives said: That for the phase 1 PRS scheme, it was proposed to make a payment of £1.84m in lieu of on-site provision of affordable housing for the reasons set out in the submitted report. For future phases comprising residential development the affordable housing provision would be on site in  accordance with the Council’s adopted policy; it was suggested that a condition requiring a review of the car parking provision and need for the delivery of the multi-storey car park at each phase of the scheme be included; it was confirmed that apartment sizes were compliant with National Standards; on the issue of education provision, officers confirmed that this had not been a site identified as requiring education provision, but the development would generate a CIL payment which could be spent on such infrastructure costs;  it was confirmed that a wind impact assessment had been submitted, but this would require a review following amendments to the outline consent; details of the lighting scheme for the public realms would be subject to condition; details of the landscaping scheme would be subject to condition; addressing the issues of cultural activities in the area and contributing to the European Capital of Culture 2023 Bid, the developers representative confirmed that significant financial support would be provided.

 

Referring to the issue of Affordable Housing Needs, the Chief Planning Officer said that changes to the Leeds Core Strategy may be required. National Planning Policy Guidance was awaited and following its receipt would be the subject of a Members Workshop/ Seminar.

 

In offering comments Members raised the following issues:

 

·  Car parking in the area was an important consideration and required to be kept under review

·  Access to the site from the Victoria Gate development remained a difficulty.

 

In drawing the discussion to a conclusion Members provided the following feedback;

 

·  Members were of the view that the increased height and the elevational treatment of Buildings E and F were acceptable

·  Members considered the mix of unit types to be acceptable

·  The majority of Members were supportive of the provision of a commuted sum in lieu of affordable housing provision on the Phase 1 development, on the understanding that the money would be used to fund affordable housing provision in the local area (Councillor Leadley was not supportive of this proposal)

·  Members considered that the closure of the route between the buildings over-night was acceptable

·  Members were supportive of the proposed amendments to the outline consent and were satisfied with the Reserved Matters Scheme subject to consultation on the full details of the landscaping scheme at the condition discharge stage.

 

In summing up the Chair said this was an impressive scheme and Members were supportive of the proposal

 

RESOLVED – That determination of Application No. 14/06543/OT and Phase 1 of the Reserved Matters Application be deferred and delegated to the Chief Planning Officer for  final determination subject to the inclusion of a condition requiring a review of the multi-storey car parking provision at each phase of the scheme

 

 

Supporting documents: