Agenda item

Future of the Alderton Heights and Gipton Gates high rise and resident rehousing

To consider the report of the Director of Communities, Housing and Environment on proposals regarding the three Alderton Heights high rise blocks in Alwoodley, and the two Gipton Gate West and East blocks in Gipton. The report outlines the proposed approach, including the proposal for all residents to be rehoused, with appropriate support for those who need it, and for subsequent demolition to clear the sites to enable the development of new modern housing. 

Minutes:

The Director of Communities, Housing and Environment submitted a report presenting proposals regarding the three Alderton Heights high rise blocks in Alwoodley, and the two Gipton Gate West and East blocks in Gipton. The report outlined the proposed approach, including the proposal for all residents to be rehoused, with appropriate support being provided, and for subsequent demolition to clear the sites in order to enable the development of new modern housing.

 

In presenting the report, the Executive Member for Environment and Housing outlined the key aspects of the proposed approach, highlighting the positive resident engagement which had taken place to date.

 

Responding to a Member’s enquiry, the Board received further information on the proposal to award ‘Band A’ housing priority and direct let status to tenants of the blocks.

 

Members also received further information on the costings associated with the options considered, and the reasons as to why the option of demolition to clear the sites to enable the development of new modern housing was being proposed.

 

Regarding the carbon footprint of the proposed approach, it was noted that, should the recommendations in the report be approved, then the intention would be to submit a further report to the Board around proposals for the development of new housing, with it being undertaken that further information regarding the carbon impact could be included within that.  In addition, and in response to a Member’s specific enquiry, the Board also received further information regarding the number of quality, energy efficient homes that were proposed to be developed, subject to a further report being submitted to the Board. 

 

RESOLVED –

(a)  That the rehousing of residents of secure tenanted flats in the affected blocks, as detailed within the submitted report be approved, and that approval be given for Home Loss and Disturbance payments to be made to qualifying residents, with it being noted that such matters will be supported by ongoing engagement with residents during implementation;

 

(b)  That the awarding of ‘Band A’ housing priority and direct let status to tenants of the blocks, be approved;

 

(c)  That the affected properties be declared as surplus, and that the suspension of lettings (to the flats and nearby garages), be approved, with any void properties being taken out of charge;

 

(d)  That approval be given for the negotiation and undertaking of the re-purchase of the leasehold flats, with approval also being given for compulsory purchase to be pursued, if a voluntary approach is unsuccessful;

 

(e)  That agreement be given that the buildings should be safely demolished, in order to create clear sites for future housing development;

 

(f)  That in parallel to the resolutions above, agreement be given that activity should be progressed to explore options for developing each site for new modern housing, and that this activity will inform a future report to the Executive Board presenting the revised proposals and the recommended options for the sites;

 

(g)  That expenditure of £5,339,200 from the Housing Revenue Account Capital Programme to deliver re-housing and building emptying activity, together with the development of design proposals for the redevelopment of the cleared sites for new modern housing, be authorised;

 

(h)  That it be agreed that Initial Demolition Notices and Final Demolition Notices will be served by the Council at the appropriate time.

 

(Under the provisions of Council Procedure Rule 16.5, Councillor Golton required it to be recorded that he abstained from voting on the decisions referred to within this Minute)

Supporting documents: